Bill O’Reilly Condemns Christians who Condemn Sin

Bill O'Reilly about Phil Robertson

I don’t have a bone to pick with Bill O’Reilly. I really don’t. Sometimes he is right and sometimes he is wrong – it’s a roll of the dice. Because of that I almost never watch his show. He just isn’t what this Christian would consider a sincere seeker of truth, since he usually only shares his personal opinion rather than researching the facts and seeking the truth. But, last Friday on the O’Reilly Factor he fully displayed his blissful ignorance of Biblical Christianity and needs to be corrected because he is leading numerous souls astray.

The first huge problem with the show was that Bill O’Reilly was giving his take on what the Duck Dynasty controversy was all about, without first reading Phil Robertson’s interview in GQ magazine. As I said, he is more of an ideologue than anything else, and a politically correct one at that.

O’Reilly claimed Phil Robertson, the patriarch of Duck Dynasty, was “misguided by targeting specific groups of people to damnation”.

The truth is that Phil Robertson did not “target” specific groups of people to “damnation.” Rather, he accurately paraphrased the Apostle Paul almost word for word when asked to define “sin”.

Phil Roberson

Phil Robertson of Duck Dynasty lost his job on A&E because he quoted the Bible.

Phil Robertson answered GQ by giving a whole list of sins including adultery, prostitution, homosexuality, bestiality, etc. which sinners must repent of if they desire to enter the kingdom of God. He did not single out any one particular sin, he simply spoke the truth and listed numerous sins and spelled out the eternal consequences of all sin. The Apostle Paul writes in 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 (which Robertson paraphrased):

“Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.”

So, Bill O’Reilly is greatly mistaken from the get go. He then went on to define what “Christian philosophy” teaches. But Biblical Christianity is not a man-made philosophy or system. Rather, Biblical Christianity is divinely inspired truth which reflects reality, and allows fallen man to have a personal relationship with our Heavenly Father. O’Reilly is what I would call a cultural Christian, not a Bible believing Christian. A Bible believing Christian believes the entire Holy Bible. The Bible in numerous places states that all scripture is God breathed, and it is to be used to “correct” sinners and lead them to a saving faith in Christ:

“All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.” – 2 Timothy 3:16-17

A cultural Christian on the other hand thinks along these lines: “Jesus lived, he was a very good man and taught a lot of really good stuff, but he wasn’t God. Some of the Bible is obviously true, but certainly not all of it. The Bible is man’s attempt to discover God, not God’s revelation of Himself to man. And since I’m a good person I will probably go to heaven.”  People making such claims in effect make Jesus out to be an evil liar or a deranged lunatic, since Jesus claimed over and over again that he was literally “God” and acknowledged that the holy scriptures were indeed true by constantly quoting from them:

Jesus said to Philip, “Have I been so long with you, and yet you have not come to know Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; how can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?” – John 14:9

Jesus also said, “I AM the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.” -John 14:6

The Bible warns about man-made philosophies:

“Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ.” - Colossians 2:8

O’Reilly on the other hand claimed, “If you adhere to the Christian philosophy, you know that Jesus was quite clear. All judgments about the consequences of sin are to be made by God and God alone. We’re all sinners. Because of that the gospel of Luke 6:37 mandates that Christian human beings refrain from judging others.”

Well, the “we’re all sinners” part is correct, but O’Reilly is twisting scripture and taking it out of context exactly like the secular humanists and liberals do. If one is going to quote scripture one has to first compare it with the rest of scripture to rightly divide the Word of God. The full context of Luke 6:37 is found over in Matthew 7:1-5. Carefully read what Jesus said:

“Judge not, that you be not judged. For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you. And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me remove the speck from your eye’; and look, a plank is in your own eye? Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.”

In context, Jesus was not saying “do not judge”, since we all make numerous judgments every single day. Rather, when judging others we must judge righteously and not be a hypocrite. In other words, don’t condemn a homosexual of his sin if you are also committing sexual sins yourself. The command to judge righteously is repeated many times in scripture. For example Jesus also said:

“Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgment.” – John 7:24

The Apostle Paul even wrote just a few verses before the passage which Phil Robertson paraphrased the following:

“Do you not know that the Lord’s people will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life!” – 1 Corinthians 6:2-3

Mr. O’Reilly claims that Christians should not judge or condemn others of sin, yet he himself judges and condemns Bible believing Christians for his perceived sin of condemning sin. That is being a textbook hypocrite. If a Christian cannot speak the truth about sin, then a person cannot repent, and therefore cannot be saved. Period. O’Reilly’s man-made “Christian philosophy” is extremely un-biblical.

Besides, the article in GQ which O’Reilly didn’t read, flat out quotes Phil Robertson where he says he never judges someone on whether they are going to heaven or hell.  He let’s God sort it out. Robertson said:

“We never, ever judge someone on who’s going to heaven, hell. That’s the Almighty’s job. We just love ’em, give ’em the good news about Jesus—whether they’re homosexuals, drunks, terrorists. We let God sort ’em out later, you see what I’m saying?”

Then O’Reilly continued his flawed analysis of Phil Robertson and blatantly twisted scripture again in order to further silence Christians:

“So, Mr. Robertson’s vision is flawed according to Luke. As I said last night this controversy is helping anti-Christian forces in the USA… he is actually hurting his own cause. Having written a book about Jesus, I know this much: Jesus was adamantly against bad behavior that injures other people. But, he would not condemn a woman in his presence who was an adulteress.”

Wrong. Wrong. Right. Wrong. Perhaps O’Reilly should have read the entire Bible before writing a book about Jesus, which he obviously does not know very well. The adulteress woman to be stoned which O’Reilly alluded to is written about in John 8:1-11. To fully understand this passage in context one has to understand that this historical event was a criminal plot thought up by the Jewish scribes and Pharisees to trap Jesus so they could murder Him.

The scribes and Pharisees marched right into the middle of a crowd which was listening to Jesus teach and they hauled with them an extremely frightened and embarrassed woman, charged by them, of committing adultery. The scribes and the Pharisees were a pack of proud, mean, arrogant, unloving, evil vipers which had no feeling, compassion, or concern for that woman whatsoever. They were just using her as a piece of bait.

They smugly marched right on in and said to Jesus:

“Teacher, this woman was caught in adultery, in the very act. Now Moses, in the law, commanded us that such should be stoned. But what do You say?”- John 8:4-5

The scribes and Pharisees pitted Jesus against Moses, and anyone reading the New Testament will discover that they exalted Moses above God. The Law of Moses was everything to them, and they were extremely confident that they had finally placed Jesus’ neck in a noose.

If Jesus publicly condemned the adulteress he would have been proven to be a hypocrite and false teacher because he had already said to the scribes and Pharisees:

“I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance.” – Mark 2:17

On the other hand, if Jesus let her off the hook and did not condemn her to death he would break the Law of Moses (Deuteronomy 22:22) and also be proven (in their eyes) to be a false teacher.

They were not concerned about “purging evil from Israel” or anything like that. They were just there to abuse the Law of Moses to trap Jesus in front of a crowd of his followers so they could finally get rid of Him.

According to the Law of Moses both the man and the woman who committed adultery were to be put to death. Why did they only drag in a woman? Where was the man?! You see, they cared nothing about her at all, and weren’t even remotely obeying the Law of Moses themselves. They were complete hypocrites.

Not only that, but in order for someone to be condemned by the Law you had to have at least two “eyewitnesses” that were willing to swear to their testimony – not easy considering the act of adultery. Where were they? And if the scribes and Pharisees truly caught her in the act themselves, how did they know the exact time that her act of adultery would take place so that they could quickly barge in, grab her, and haul her off to Jesus while he was still teaching that morning at the Jewish temple? The entire situation reeks to high heaven. Are you seeing how evil their plot was? They obviously set her up and entrapped her from the get go, and were willing to illegally murder her if need be to kill Jesus.

Well, Jesus the Son of God knew exactly what to do in this seemingly no-win situation:

“But Jesus stooped down and wrote on the ground with His finger, as though He did not hear. So when they continued asking Him, He raised Himself up and said to them, ‘He who is without sin among you, let him throw a stone at her first.’ And again He stooped down and wrote on the ground. Then those who heard it, being convicted by their conscience, went out one by one, beginning with the oldest even to the last. And Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst. When Jesus had raised Himself up and saw no one but the woman, He said to her, ‘Woman, where are those accusers of yours? Has no one condemned you?’

“She said, ‘No one, Lord.

“And Jesus said to her, ‘Neither do I condemn you; go and sin no more.‘”

Notice, Jesus did not condemn her under the “Law of Moses” which the scribes and Pharisees were misusing, but He did tell her flat out and straight to her face: “go and sin no more.”

Bill O’Reilly’s flawed philosophy cuts “go and sin no more” right out of the Holy Bible. That is a terrible abuse of scripture. Then O’Reilly shared more of his personal opinions:

“And time after time the Nazarene persuaded folks that his way of living was worthy because it was so compassionate. Homosexual Americans should not be demonized. Just like devout Christians should not be demonized, and people of strong beliefs should understand the big picture. Portraying gay Americans as sinners gives license to harm them. It is insulting and demeaning. Jesus would persuade, not condemn.”

What absolute non-sense. Nobody is being demonized. Homosexuals are just sinners, and it is not being insulting and demeaning to point out that fact. Rather, it is the truth and also an expression of a Christians love for them. God hates their sin so much he destroyed four entire cities by fire and brimstone because of it (Deuteronomy 29:23). Homosexuals need to understand that homosexuality is a sin so they can repent and be saved by accepting the free gift of pardon which Jesus purchased for them on the cross — just like everyone else on the planet. Homosexuals are not exempt from the Almighty’s perfect holy standard, nor are they any more special than anybody else. Hasn’t O’Reilly, A&E, and the homosexual lobby ever heard of: “Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me”? I mean grow up people. The Bible believing Christian is simply speaking the truth in love. The homosexual then has a free choice to believe the truth or not, just like any other sinner.

Lastly, O’Reilly is greatly mistaken about Jesus never condemning others. Jesus condemned sinners very often and extremely bluntly at times, especially the teachers of the Law. Does this sound like Jesus was using some gentle persuasion tactic on them:

“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs which on the outside appear beautiful, but inside they are full of dead men’s bones and all uncleanness. So you, too, outwardly appear righteous to men, but inwardly you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness. … You serpents, you brood of vipers, how will you escape the sentence of hell?!” – Matthew 23:27-28,33

Am I saying scream at people? Of course not. Jesus, unlike us, knew exactly what those scribes and Pharisees needed to hear at the time, and also where they were going to wind up if they did not repent and accept Him as Messiah. But Jesus did condemn sinful behavior and spoke the truth about it even if it hurt someones feelings. He never once just gave sin a free pass. For example, Jesus said to the rich man who was trying to work his way to heaven (which by the way cannot work):

‘If you wish to be complete, go and sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.’ But when the young man heard this statement, he went away grieving;” – Matthew 19:21-22

Jesus also said to the cripple he healed at the Pool of Bethesda, “See, you have been made well. Sin no more, lest a worse thing come upon you. – John 5-14

Jesus never preached: “Live and let live brother. Do whatever you want. God will forgive you. Party on! Oh, and don’t spread the gospel or condemn sin because that might hurt someones feelings.” Satan himself preaches those lies.

Bill O’Reilly then (to my utter amazement) pointed his own pen at himself and proudly proclaimed to his entire television audience: “There is no one more involved in protecting Judeo-Christian tradition in America than me.” I heard Billy Graham came in a very distant second.

Bill O'Reilly Concerning Himself

He continued, “I fully understand how the far-left secular progressives want to change this country. And in order to do that they have to marginalize people of faith. People like Mr. Robertson who oppose unfettered abortion, gay marriage, and other S-P causes. But you win the battle by reason and by putting forth the strongest argument for the greater good of all Americans.”

Drew Magary, the author of the article in GQ, which as I said O’Reilly didn’t read, wrote that Phil Robertson personally told him to write the following in his article which he did:

“You put in your article that the Robertson family really believes strongly that if the human race loved each other and they loved God, we would just be better off. We ought to just be repentant, turn to God, and let’s get on with it, and everything will turn around.”

Wise words indeed. The fact of the matter is that Americans are losing the culture war because of cultural Christians like Bill O’Reilly and not because of Bible believing Christians like Phil who boldly do what Jesus commanded them to do, which is to make disciples of all the nations by proclaiming the Truth:

“Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you.” – Matthew 28:19-20

The Apostle Paul further explains that we have to gently “correct” the opposition (as Robertson did), not be silent concerning sin as Mr O’Reilly desires: “… be kind to all, able to teach, patient when wronged, with gentleness correcting those who are in opposition, if perhaps God may grant them repentance leading to the knowledge of the truth, and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, having been held captive by him to do his will.” – 2 Timothy 2:24-26

I pray that Bill O’Reilly comes to his senses soon and stops spreading un-biblical non-sense. Concerning Christianity, at present he certainly does not know much about what he is talking about. Perhaps in the future by the grace of God he will.

Have a blessed day.


Sean Kirkpatrick

Why Phil Robertson is not a Homophobic Bigot


Phil Robertson of Duck Dynasty
Interviewed by GQ Magazine


The suspension of Phil Robertson from Duck Dynasty by the A&E Network has caused quite a ruckus. It all started when he was interviewed by pro-homosexual magazine GQ. He said during the interview:

“Everything is blurred on what’s right and what’s wrong … Sin becomes fine. Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there. Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and that woman and those men,”

He then paraphrasing 1 Corinthians 6:9-10: “Don’t be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers – they won’t inherit the kingdom of God. Don’t deceive yourself. It’s not right.”

Well, those quotes drove the homo-fascist lobby completely batty. Naturally, the tolerant liberals and progressives, as they like to call themselves, were screaming bloody murder that a human would dare claim that “homosexuality is a sin”, and that “homosexuals are sinners.” – “Oh the horror of it all! Homophobic bigoted hate speech!!! We absolutely will not tolerate intolerance! He must be fired!”

But Phil Robertson was not saying anything bigoted or hateful because in Biblical Christianity everyone, including Phil Robertson, is a sinner. From a Christian perspective homosexuals are really nothing special since we all have a very long rap sheet. To Christians, homosexuals are just fellow fallen human beings.  The Bible clearly says that all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God:

“This righteousness is given through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference between Jew and Gentile, for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and all are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus.” – Romans 3:22-24

Phil was just stating the hard fact that homosexuals are sinners, their behavior is sinful in the sight of a perfectly Holy God, and they must repent and accept Jesus as their Lord and Savior to be saved. Jesus said:

“I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.”

The Apostle Peter proclaimed:

“Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out, that times of refreshing may come from the Lord,” – Acts 3:19.

You see, the Lord himself will clean the sinner up over time as he draws closer to God. The reason that the hard left was freaked-out by Phil Robertson’s comments is because (deep down) they know that what he was saying is true, and they absolutely hate him for it. Phil Robertson shared the gospel, proclaimed the truth, and he in effect got fired for it. That proves he did well because Jesus also said:

“Blessed are you when people hate you, when they exclude you and insult you and reject your name as evil, because of the Son of Man.” – Luke 6:22

That said, since this is America, I’m boycotting A&E and I strongly suggest Duck Dynasty simply move to another network that isn’t filled with as many wimpy, politically correct, intolerant,  Christian hating bigots.

Let’s be clear. A&E broke the law and violated the 1964 Civil Rights Act by suspending Phil Robertson from Duck Dynasty because of his religion. The 1964 Civil Rights Act states:

“It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer – to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin;”

But don’t hold your breath that Eric Holder’s Department of Injustice will do anything about that.


Have a blessed day.


Sean Kirkpatrick

The Beginning of the End

Thanks to the train wreck of the unaffordable Affordable Care Act (AKA: Obamacare) the low information voters are finally starting to realize that they were completely duped.

Out of blind faith for five years they believed the constant stream of lies spewed out by Obama, the democrats, and the liberal mainstream media. Voters might want to take note and finally realize that the Tea Party (which includes myself) was never racist, nor extremist, nor bigoted, nor homophobic. Rather, we were absolutely right. We were right all along about what comrade Obama, Obamacare, and his out of control government spending would do.

Fellow hard hitting seeker of truth Bill Whittle of PJTV explains:

“When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, the people groan.” – Proverbs 29:2

Vote wisely come 2014, but it may very well be too late for America. Stay focused on Jesus or you will probably get very depressed and angry. The real pain and horror hasn’t even begun yet.

Have a blessed day.


Sean Kirkpatrick

Remembering the World’s Most Beloved Terrorist

mandela at communist ANC 1990

Winnie Mandela, Nelson Mandela, and Russian Yossel “Joe” Slova at an ANC rally in 1990

Our fallen world is a rather insane place. For instance, if a man came to this planet, lived a sinless life, proclaimed the good news of salvation and eternal life, did a ministry of miracles, healed the sick, gave sight to the blind, and fed the poor, one might think he wouldn’t be nailed to a cross for it. So, should we be surprised today when almost the entire world mourned the loss of an extremely violent communist revolutionary who targeted and murdered countless innocent civilians? No.

On December 10 2013, over 75 presidents, prime ministers, royalty, and communist dictators converged upon Johannesburg South Africa to pay their last respects to the world’s most beloved communist revolutionary and terrorist — Nelson Mandela.

Now I can hear someone scream: “But, Nelson Mandela helped end apartheid!!!”

That is true, Mandela did help end apartheid which was a very evil system. But, Mandela’s “methods” which he used to end apartheid were far worse and more evil than apartheid itself. The true historical facts concerning Nelson Mandela will be news to many, primarily because the western mainstream media refuses to report the truth, Hollywood produces hard left propaganda, and the public schools don’t teach history in context.

The list of dignitaries who attended Mandela’s memorial was extremely impressive. Barack Obama and first lady Michelle were there, as well as former presidents George W. Bush, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary. They were all there sitting right along side communist butchers such as Cuban President Raul “The Executioner” Castro and Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe.

Oddly enough (or maybe not), when former British Prime Minister Margret Thatcher died last April, no living U.S. Presidents attended her funeral to show their respect, even though she helped bring down the Berlin Wall which freed millions from the tyranny of communism. Not one!

Why is that? Could it be that our former American presidents since Reagan have more, ideologically speaking, in common with communists and two-bit murdering dictators than with capitalism, liberty, justice, and freedom?

During the memorial to the beloved Nelson Mandela, speakers seemed to gloss over numerous major historical facts. For example, Obama compared the former South African president to Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr., but he failed to mention that Mandela was a militant communist revolutionary and a professional terrorist. Nelson Mandela was in fact not only a secret member of the South African Communist Party (SACP), but a member of the SACP’s Central Committee and he kept close connections with them to the very last. The SACP brags about this fact on their own website:

“At his arrest in August 1962, Nelson Mandela was not only a member of the then underground South African Communist Party, but was also a member of our Party’s Central Committee. To us as South African communists, Cde [Comrade] Mandela shall forever symbolize the monumental contribution of the SACP in our liberation struggle. The contribution of communists in the struggle to achieve the South African freedom has very few parallels in the history of our country. After his release from prison in 1990, Cde [Comrade] Madiba became a great and close friend of the communists till his last days.”

But it gets much worse. Nelson Mandela was also the head of the revolutionary terrorist wing of the communist African National Congress (ANC) called the “Umkhonto we Sizwe”, translated “Spear of the Nation” or  “MK” for short. Mandela was personally trained by murderer Che Guevara and the Cuban secret intelligence service (DGI) to make bombs and blow people up – which he did in great quantity.

Mandela and his MK were directly responsible for the manufacture, planting, and detonation of bombs at railway stations, shopping centers, bars, post offices, inside churches, and in the 1980′s even inside video arcades. Civilians were their primary target of terror, and they mostly killed and wounded blacks. Mandela’s MK also routinely tortured and executed civilians which didn’t support the ANC’s communist “revolution” which was being directed by the Soviet Union.

After being arrested for acts of terrorism in 1962, Mandela (who was a lawyer) pleaded guilty to 156 acts of terrorism. He also helped obtain and manufacture tons of explosives. According to the evidence submitted in court this included 210,000 hand grenades, 48,000 anti-personnel mines, 1,500 time devices, 144 tons of ammonium nitrate, 21.6 tons of aluminum powder and a ton of black powder. Mandela got off light with only a life sentence, he could have easily gotten the death penalty for high treason.

On Fox News “Special Report” on December 5th, Jesse Jackson admitted that Nelson Mandela even told him that he was actively planning the bombings of schools before he got caught. Did Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. ever do that?! Yet, Jesse Jackson still considers this bloody terrorist a hero.

Here is a short list of some of the orchestrated carnage Mandela’s MK terrorists carried out for him and the ANC while he was in prison:

1981 – 2 car bombs at Durban showrooms
1983 – Church Street Bomb (killed 19, wounded 217)
1984 – Durban car bomb (killed 5, wounded 27)
1985-1987 – At least 150 landmines on farm roads (killed 125)
1985 – Amanzimtoti Sanlam shopping centre bomb Dec 23 (killed 5)
1986 – Magoo’s Bar bomb (killed 3, wounded 69)
1986 – Newcastle Court bomb (wounded 24)
1987 – Johannesburg Court bomb (killed 3, wounded 10)
1987 – Wits command centre car bomb (killed 1, wounded 68)
1988 – Johannesburg video arcade (killed 1 unborn baby, wounded 10)
1988 – Roodepoort bank bomb (killed 4, wounded 18)
1988 – Pretoria Police housing unit, 2 bombs (wounded 3)
1988 – Magistrate’s Court bomb (killed 3)
1988 – Benoni Wimpy Bar bomb (killed 1, wounded 56)
1988 – Witbank shopping centre bomb (killed 2, wounded 42)
1988 – Ellis Park Rugby Stadium car bomb (killed 2, wounded 37)

But, this is only the tip of the iceberg. The ANC’s greatest contribution to modern terrorism was an entirely new form of execution which they perfected and called “necklacing”. The victim to be executed was tightly bound, then a tire filled with gasoline was forced around the victim’s chest and arms, and then it was set on fire. Time to break out the hotdogs and marshmallows, because it could take over 20 minutes for the poor, screaming, burning victim to finally die.

1,000 blacks were burned to death by ANC “Necklacing”

While Nelson Mandela was serving his prison sentence, his loving communist wife Winnie (who later was found guilty in court for personally torchering a 14 year old boy named James Seipei to death) helped keep the violent flames of the revolution burning by publicly endorsing “necklacing” to all her fellow ANC/MK comrades.


“With our boxes of matches and our necklaces we shall liberate this country!” — Winnie Mandela

On January 13st  1985, South African State President P. W. Botha kindly offered the world’s most beloved terrorist a conditional release. The conditions were this, if Mandela would simply renounce violence as a means to bring about change in South Africa he could go scot-free. Mandela flatly refused, since he preferred prison over non-violence.

Both Margaret Thatcher and president Ronald Reagan recognized the ANC as a communist terrorist organization during the Cold War, as did most other leaders throughout the free world. In 1990 Mandela was released from prison without renouncing violence or terrorism. The American State Department had already declared the ANC a “terrorist organization” and rightly placed Mandela on their terrorist watch list, where he remained until 2008.

Over the years the worlds most beloved terrorist also supported and befriended many other like minded murderers from around the globe, including PLO terrorist Yasser Arafat, Muammar Gaddafi, and Fidel Castro. Concerning Fidel and communist Cuba (which Castro turned into a veritable hellhole) Mandela said:

“Long live the Cuban revolution. Long live comrade Fidel Castro … Cuban internationalists have done so much for African independence, freedom and justice. We admire the sacrifices of the Cuban people in maintaining their independence and sovereignty in the face of a vicious imperialist campaign designed to destroy the advances of the Cuban revolution. We too want to control our destiny. … There can be no surrender. It is a case of freedom or death. The Cuban revolution has been a source of inspiration to all freedom-loving people!”

And even though communist regimes had already murdered tens of millions of their own citizens during the first half of last century, Nelson Mandela still proclaimed in 1961:

“The cause of communism is the greatest cause in the history of mankind!”

During South Africa’s Apartheid years, the country was the migratory destination for Africans from all over the continent because even under Apartheid (as bad as it was) blacks in South Africa lived far better off than they did in the African countries ruled by black communists.

Today, thanks to Mandela and the ANC, South Africa is ruled by communists too, and rapidly sliding toward becoming another Zimbabwe where government sponsored rape, theft, and murder of all races is the norm. Since Mandela came to power in 1994 approximately 300,000 people have been murdered in South Africa and the economy had been decimated.

Yes, Nelson Mandela helped end apartheid, but the only method he ever attempted to use to achieve his goal was a violent, racist, communist revolution which blew-up and burned to death scores of civilians on purpose.

The real historical Nelson Mandela left a legacy which is one of spreading hate, communism, racism, cultural division, bloodshed, fear, terror, poverty, disease and death. He was a god hating, unrepentant terrorist and hardened communist to his dying day and should be remembered as such. But he won’t be by most because the world has been sold a monstrous cleverly crafted and packaged lie:

“Nelson Mandela was a kind, peaceful, saintly man, who was a champion for freedom. He was  almost Christ-like.”

The fact that so many around the world believe that lie testifies to how far gone the world really is. If the entire world accepts a hardened communist and terrorist as a saint what will stop the world from accepting the Anti-Christ???

Nelson Mandela and Fidel Castro

Nelson Mandela and Fidel Castro. Two communist murders made for each other.

Jesus warned to not be deceived in the last days:

“Take heed that you not be deceived. For many will come in My name, saying, ‘I am He,’ and, ‘The time has drawn near.’ Therefore do not go after them. But when you hear of wars and commotions, do not be terrified; for these things must come to pass first, but the end will not come immediately.”

We are so close to the Tribulation that some days I wake up and can smell the smoke.

Seek the Truth and don’t be deceived!

Have a blessed day.

Sean Kirkpatrick

Recommended Viewing for those who want to learn more about this topic (viewer discretion is advised):

You do not want a Winnie Mandela necklace with Dr. Peter Hammond of


Is Nelson Mandela a role model or criminal? with Dr. Peter Hammond

How America morphed into ‘Bizarro World’


David Kupelian takes readers on a tour of the upside-down dimension we now inhabit

As part of my well-rounded childhood, growing up during the 1950s in suburban Washington, D.C., I read Superman comic books.

That’s right. Also Superboy, Batman and Robin, Aquaman, Flash, Green Arrow, Green Lantern and others – but my favorite was Superman. And one of the most memorable characters in those adventures was a guy named … Bizarro.

Created when the “man of steel” was exposed to a “duplicate ray,” Bizarro was essentially a defective clone of Superman. Although he was ugly, surly and spoke broken English like Tonto in “The Lone Ranger” (“Me hate Superman. Him bad”), Bizarro’s defining characteristic was his total rebellion against everything normal, everything sensible, everything Superman stood for. Indeed, he took pride in being the exact opposite of Superman in every way.

Thus, Bizarro eventually relocated to Bizarro World, a cube-shaped planet called Htrae (“Earth” spelled backwards), which operated according to “Bizarro logic” – meaning it was wrong to do anything right, moral or good. That gave rise to the Bizarro society’s legal system based on the “Bizarro Code,” which meant it was “a crime to do anything well or to make anything perfect or beautiful.”

For example, I remember reading, as a 9- or 10-year-old Superman fan, how on Bizarro World, when the street-sweeping truck came down the road, instead of sweeping up dirt and debris, the Bizarro street-sweeper guy would actually throw dust and dirt onto the streets to make them dirtier! In every area of life, Bizarro folk did the opposite of whatever was logical and normal.

Got the picture?

Now, let’s look at today’s USA, which increasingly resembles a “Bizarro” version of traditional America – not just different, not just “transformed,” but morphed in so many ways into the opposite of what it once was.

Please read the rest of his excellent and informative article here.